- SAG news
-

jenstc2003
- November 23rd, 2008
Apparently, the members of the SAG union- which represents actors of all levels in the film and television fields- has decided to ask its members to consider a strike. Here we go again- only this one has the potential to be even worse than the writer's strike last winter was, given the current economic crisis. I have to say that this is no time for another strike. That's not saying that the producers, etc, are necessarily asking the actors to make only reasonable concessions. They're not. But this is a time for negotiations- good faith, possibly long term negotiations- rather than drama like a strike. Taking away the income that those who are currently working as actors, as well as many of the behind the scenes employees who will be forced to honor the strike by their own unions, are making at this point in an attempt to gain a bit more on the other side seems more than a bit short sighted to me, especially in the current climate. If the union is to claim that it represents ALL of its members, rather than simply the A listers who could easily afford to not work, then it needs to consider the needs of all it's members, as well as the impact it's decision will have on others beyond it's membership. Right now, in my mind at least, that means making sure that they come to some sort of agreement so that they can keep the entire industry working so that the members can earn the money they need to survive. If that means giving up something the union would like for the time being in order to make the deal, why not? If the members find it such a bad deal, they can always turn it down anyway (and somehow, I suspect that most would not.) At that point, I could understand the desire for a strike, but not now.
Now, I absolutely think that more residuals would be well deserved, as would a cut of some of the new technology profits, and many of the other requests that are being made. I don't think that the actors union is being at all unreasonable in their requests. Unfortunately, I think that those issues are going to be difficult to overcome, and I have to think that shutting down an entire industry to the detriment of untold thousands of people in a time when the economy is bad to begin with is just not wise. To me, as an outsider, it only makes sense to make a deal at this point... however flawed it might be. These types of contracts are renegotiated from time to time, and clearly even the current deal isn't so horrible that they were unwilling to continue working under it for a while after it's terms expired. But these issues aren't going to iron themselves out in a day, and the producers do have some valid points which need to be taken into consideration. Hence, it's going to take time for these issues to be worked out. Right now, the actors union seems unwilling to give it that time. If they were to make a deal now, flaws and all, I suspect that the deepest of the sticking points can be worked out by the time the next contract needs to be made- and without question they should be ironed out by that point. At the least, one can hope that the economic climate will be better then, and perhaps some of the practical issues that the producers have brought up- such as deciding how best to figure out the new technology residuals, which could be difficult right now- could be clearer by that point. Also, after the producers have some time to look at the numbers, the deal might be a lot sweeter in a couple of years than what would be available right now anyway, IMHO. For now, though, it's not right to force people who are already mired in a financially difficult time lose what income they have on a gamble that might not pay off. Make a deal, and then iron out the issues on the next go- round.